Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Declaration by Joseph de Arimathea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration by Joseph de Arimathea

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable references - I can't even verify the book exists. The references are a dead blogspot blog, and another book I can't verify exists. Based on the author's creation of Apocrypha of the Virgin Mary, I have no idea if the book was supposedly written in modern or ancient times. There is no reliable content here at all. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete After a great deal of looking around I have found the actual text referenced, which in English (rather than, apparently, Spanish) is referred to as the "Narrative of Joseph of Arimathea". New Advent has it here and Bart Ehrman talks about it in his blog here. It may be worth an article, but this one is worthless and has the wrong name. Time to break out the WP:TNT. Mangoe (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Firstly, thank Mangoe for providing the research. There are unsubstantiated claims in this article, which does not examine New Testament apocrypha as a phenomenon, nor does the article give any sources for the mss, nor the original language, and no exegesis of the document. The whole thing is likely to be a fake. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.